Sunday, January 31, 2010

Co powiedział były premier Oleksy o Kwasniewskim, Millerze,Rewinie,Belce, Napieralskim,Krauze,Jasiek Wolek, Borowski, Cimoszewicz, Centrala Handlu Zag

Co powiedział były premier Oleksy o Kwasniewskim, Millerze,Rewinie,Belce, Napieralskim,Krauze,Jasiek Wolek, Borowski, Cimoszewicz, Centrala Handlu Zagranicznego,Szwajcaria Liftyngi,Slawomir Miller,Edward Kuczera,

Part1

Part2

Saturday, January 30, 2010

CHRISTINE O'DONNELL TRIP TO POLAND AND RAIOMARYJA 2010 U.S. SENATE RACE FOR JOE BIDEN'S SEAT

CHRISTINE O'DONNELL TRIP TO POLAND AND RAIOMARYJA 2010 U.S. SENATE RACE FOR JOE BIDEN'S SEAT

Christine O'Donnell for Senate's Blurbs
About me:
Hi. I'm Christine O'Donnell, and I'm running for the U.S. Senate in Delaware in 2008. I want to thank the thousands of supporters in our state and around the country who helped me win the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate. As we move into the general election to unseat Sen. Joe Biden, I will be updating you on our campaign and asking for your continued support. 2008 is a transformative moment in our history. Together we can bring REAL change to Washington and vote out partisan career politicians like Joe Biden. For years I have worked as a political commentator on such shows as THE O'REILLY FACTOR, HANNITY AND COLMES, THE GLENN BECK SHOW, YOUR WORLD WITH NEIL CAVUTO, FOX AND FRIENDS, AND HARDBALL WITH CHRIS MATHEWS. As a marketing and communications executive, I worked with the film THE PASSION OF CHRIST, and groups like Concerned Women for America, the Republican National Committee, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, and the World Education and Development Fund. As a social advocate in D.C., I lobbied the United Nations in support of pro-family global policies, and I continue to make the needs of working families my top priority. I have the policy experience to know how Washington works, and the real-life experience to know how Washington SHOULD work. I hope you will join our movement to bring real change to Washington and truly serve the long-neglected needs of our state of Delaware. Together we can bring an end to partisanship and pettiness in politics. We can say "no" to life-long politicians who put their own ambitions before the good of our country and the needs of the people of their state. Politics is supposed to be about service not self-interest, and that's why I'm running for the U.S. Senate. Join me and we can truly make a difference. Visit www.christineodonnell08.com for more information.
Who I'd like to meet:
I'd like to meet any of my fellow Delawareans. I'm a Republican but don't believe that any one party can have a monopoly on virtue so would like to get to know anyone from ANY party who believes that we can bring real change to Washington.


















CHRISTINE O'DONNELL visit to Poland and Radio Maryja

AS SHE DISCUSSES HER CANDIDACY IN THE 2010 U.S. SENATE RACE FOR JOE BIDEN'S SEAT.

[2010-01-28]Ameryka dzisiaj
Christine O"Donnell - kandydatka do Senatu USA z ramienia Partii Konserwatywnej


Christine O'Donnell was welcomed with a huge applause as she addressed the audience at a recent Dover, DE rally. The audience cheered as Christine expressed her opposition to the government takeover of health care, wasteful spending, and other anti-free-enterprise efforts by Washington beltway politicians, and why 2010 holds great promise in turning the tide in Congress.

Christine told the audience that although she has not officially announced her candidacy, she has filed in the 2010 U.S. Senate race. On other words, she's all in. The official announcement will come when the O'Donnell for US Senate team reaches their first fundraising goal. She stressed that she is running in this special election no matter how long it takes to reach that initial goal.

Christine O'Donnell won the Republican Party nomination for the U.S. Senate race in last year's Delaware election. On September 30, 2009, Rasmussen Reports released a poll showing that Christine holds state-wide name recognition, and when compared to Mike Castle and Beau Biden, Christine ranks with them in the 40 percentile bloc, with a two-to-one edge over Biden among unaffiliated voters.

The Delaware 9-12 Patriots have invited Christine O'Donnell and Mike Castle to participate in what will be the first debate of this election cycle. Christine has accepted the invitation. Organizers are awaiting Rep. Castle's response. The tentative date for this debate is January 9, 2010.

Radowslaw Sikorski nie broni mniejszosci Polskiej w Niemczech dla "Die Welt"

Radowslaw Sikorski nie broni mniejszosci Polskiej w Niemczech dla "Die Welt"
Nadal obowiazuje prawo Hermana Geogering

Radowslaw Sikorski nie broni mniejszosci Polskiej w Niemczech dla "Die Welt"
Nadal obowiazuje prawo Hermana Geogering


Pittsburgh Press - Google News Archive - Mar 4, 1940
BERLIN— Activities by Polish minority organizations in Germany were forbidden today in a decree issued by Marshal Herman Goering, No. 2 Nazi . ...

Devastation of Poland, the starving out of its populace and the ... worked out by Field Marshal Hermann Goering and being carried out by Dr. Hans Frank
Plan by Goering to Ruin Poland To Benefit Nazi... - Montreal Gazette - Google News Archive

Nazis Seize All Property Held By Poles .Factories, Forests, Farms...
Deseret News - Google News Archive - Feb 19, 1940

1 when the German invasion of Poland started. Such lands and forests, ... As Field Marshal Hermann Goering, head of Ger many's four-year economic plan

Mandate Over Islands Same As Ownership, Japan Holds .
Reading Eagle - Google News Archive - Mar 24, 1933
Most of the Eastern Jews in the Palatinate emigrated there from Poland since 1914 ... Herman Goering, Minister without portfolio, for the post and the ...

Friday, January 29, 2010

Polish Jewish relations Witold Pilecki was a common man who lived in uncommon times. He was a victim of Communism, Fascism, Socialism, and Emperialism

Polish Jewish relations Witold Pilecki was a common man who lived in uncommon times. He was a victim of Communism, Fascism, Socialism, and Emperialism



Jedwabne czyli pogrzeb Polski (1/2)




"Jedwabne Jaja" czyli pogrzeb Polski (2/2)



A real hero - Witold Pilecki - A Volunteer for Auschwitz



Katyn Andrzej Wajda Film (english version)
"Katyn", directed by Wajda, is the first Polish film on the Katyn crime and the so-called Katyn lie.
The movie uses stories from an authentic diary of major Adam Solski found during the exhumation in 1943 to tell the fate of four fictional officers and their families.

Wajda's father, lt. Jakub Wajda, then 43, was among the Polish officers taken prisoner by the Soviet army and killed by a shot to the back of the head in the Katyn forest.

In March 1940 Soviet leader Josef Stalin ordered the executions of 22,000 Polish army and police officers, intellectuals and clergy. The killings took place in the spring of the same year in the Katyn Forest. The victims, mostly from POW camps in Kozielsk, Starobielsk and Ostaszkow, were shot in the back of the head. The Nazis discovered the mass graves during their march on Moscow in the fall of 1941, but Soviet propaganda blamed the deaths on Adolf Hitler and punished anyone speaking the truth with harsh prison terms. In 1990, Moscow admitted that dictator Josef Stalin's secret police were responsible.



Irena Sendler

why the story was not know in US?


Irena Sendler-Polish woman who helped save the lives of 2,500 Jewish children during World War II.Mother of the Holocaust Children. ZEGOTA - Council for Aid to Jews in Occupied Poland (1942-1945)....


Marian Rejewski, Jerzy Rozycki, Henryk Zygalski and other cryptoanalysts from BS4, broke into Kriegsmarine code in November 1932. The Polish-made replicas of the apparatus (the Enigma-"doubles to t...

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Stanisław Michalkiewicz w Radiu Maryja - 20.01.2010 r

Stanisław Michalkiewicz w Radiu Maryja - 20.01.2010 r

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Marco Vincent Dive Resort Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com

Marco Vincent Dive Resort Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com

Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com

Server was never paid to RAQport as promised.

Until the Server is paid to RAQport.com Virginia Company Marco Vincent Dive Resort has no legal right to use the server.


Their manager Mel Agudo from Connecticut office has promised to make the payment and he never did.
As a small business from Virginia I have to collect our money for the advance Web Server Supermicro Hardware.

I know it is not a lot but I do not like when people lie


Please mark this company for your black list: Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com

1. not to travel to Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com in Philippines
2. not to do any business with Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc of Philippines


Do not do any business with Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com or they will take your services, hardware or money
After dealing with US Manager for Marco Vincent Dive Resort mvdive.com I will never travel to scuba dive or go for any trip to that resort.

I will tell all my friend from Washington DC IMF and the World Bank not to use this company and Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc

Mvdive is still avoiding to make payment to RAQport Virginia Company for the Web Server which never paid in full.
Please stay away from doing any business with dishonest Marco Vincent Dive Resort. Beware Of Mvdive and their Marco Vincent Dive Resort in The Philippines.
Their US Manager Mel Agudo from Stanford Connecticut did lie about payment several to our company.

Marco Vincent Offices

USA Office :



Business Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 403 Wilton, CT 06897


US Toll Free:

1(866)8196165



Philippines Corporate Office :

Unit 503 Cityland 10 Tower 1
156 H.V Dela Costa St. cor. Ayala Ave.
Makati City, Philippines

Tel. Nos. (632)813-6329, (632) 813-6812, (632) 813-6806
Telefax: (632)892-0309

Mobile: (63)-920-951-0128



UK Office :



Contact Persons :

Mel Armitage
Trade Winds


35 Elmshott Lane Cippenham Slough SL1 5QS

UK Telephone : 07956 413924
Email Address : tradewind100@aol.com

To: Mel B. Agudo of Mel B. Agudo

CC:Ronald Servidio [ronald@is-isp.net] and CC http://mvdive.blogspot.com/ Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI)
CC: webmaster@tourism.gov.ph

Mr. Agudo,

With all the respect You Mr. Agudo. You are in fault. I did had great image about people of the Philippines and the people.

But You did change that You were not honest to me.


Why did You Lie To Me as the manage/ director of the Marco Vincent Corporation? and did not reply and did not paid?

You did not keep your gentleman promise and our agreement? All small business is base on trust.

Only $200.00

RAQport.com we are small business and we need money to pay our bills and taxes


Marco Vincent Dive Resort http://mvdive.com or Marco Vincent Corporation, Inc Philippines is Fraudulently Using Web Server from RAQport.com

Server was never paid to RAQport as promised.

Until the Server is paid to RAQport.com Virginia Company Marco Vincent Dive Resort has no legal right to use the server.


Their manager Mel Agudo from Connecticut office has promised to make the payment and he never did.
As a small business from Virginia I have to collect our money for the advance Web Server Supermicro Hardware.

I know it is not a lot but I do not like when people lie.

Friday, January 15, 2010

Poland stands alone in refusing swine flu vaccines

Poland stands alone in refusing swine flu vaccines






Woman Disabled by THIS YEARS FLU SHOT (10 days AFTER vaccination )





Polish patients wait to see doctors at a local clinic in Lomianki, near Warsaw, Poland, Wednesday, Jan. 13, 2010. Poland has refused to buy swine flu vaccines out of safety fears, the only country known to take such a stance, and only one leading Polish official, Janusz Kochanowski, has waged a prominent public fight against the government over vaccines, condemning its stance as irrational and irresponsible. Now that the current outbreak appears to have peaked in much of Europe, many Poles feel the government has been vindicated: countries with large stockpiles often saw low public interest in the vaccines and face financial loss with unused doses now set to expire. (AP Photo/Czarek Sokolowski) (Czarek Sokolowski - AP)



Photo taken in May 2009, of Janusz Kochanowski, Poland's ombudsman for civil rights. Poland has refused to buy swine flu vaccines out of safety fears, the only country known to take such a stance, and only one leading Polish official, Janusz Kochanowski, has waged a prominent public fight against the government over vaccines, condemning its stance as irrational and irresponsible. Now that the current outbreak appears to have peaked in much of Europe, Wednesday Jan. 13, 2010, many Poles feel the government has been vindicated: countries with large stockpiles often saw low public interest in the vaccines and face financial loss with unused doses now set to expire. (AP Photo) (Str - AP)



Polish patients wait to see doctors at a local clinic in Lomianki, near Warsaw, Poland, Wednesday, Jan. 13, 2010. Poland has refused to buy swine flu vaccines out of safety fears, the only country known to take such a stance, and only one leading Polish official, Janusz Kochanowski, has waged a prominent public fight against the government over vaccines, condemning its stance as irrational and irresponsible. Now that the current outbreak appears to have peaked in much of Europe, many Poles feel the government has been vindicated: countries with large stockpiles often saw low public interest in the vaccines and face financial loss with unused doses now set to expire. (AP Photo/Czarek Sokolowski) (Czarek Sokolowski - AP)



 

 

 

WARSAW, Poland -- The decision seemed fraught with risk: a government refusing to import swine flu vaccines amid worldwide warnings of a spreading epidemic.

But Poland did just that, becoming the only country worldwide known to reject the vaccines over safety fears and distrust in the drug companies producing them - concerns international health experts reject as unfounded.

Now that the current outbreak appears to have peaked in much of Europe, many Poles feel their government has been vindicated: Countries with large stockpiles often saw low public interest in the vaccines and face financial loss from unused doses now set to expire. But Poland's government didn't spend a cent fighting the epidemic.

All along, the decision by Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Health Minister Ewa Kopacz met with broad support. Even with 145 swine flu deaths in Poland to date, many Poles view the rejection of the vaccines as a laudable gesture of defiance against pharmaceutical companies, sentiment shaped by a strengthening anti-vaccine movement and conspiracy theories about the vaccines circulating on the Internet.

"I had the impression that the information about swine flu was manipulated in order to create a panic," said Barbara Lazniewska, a 38-year-old architect who was among the many Poles to applaud the government's stance.

Poles take pride in having a strong independent streak and many respect the government for defying the EU, the World Health Organization and other international groups that urged countries to implement vaccination programs - advice that smacked to some of meddling in internal affairs.

The prime minister described Poland as a country with the rare "courage" to refuse a vaccine that he believes has not undergone sufficient testing.

 

"We are making this decision only in the interest of the Polish patient and the taxpayer," Tusk insisted in December. "We will not take part because it's not honest and it's not safe for the patient."

The anti-vaccine movement argues it is untested or contains risky ingredients, like the preservative thimerosal. However, there is little difference in the swine flu vaccine's formulation from the regular flu vaccine, which is available in Poland, and all evidence so far suggests it is safe and effective. The WHO says more than 150 million people have been vaccinated in more than 40 countries and that no unusual or dangerous side effects have been seen.

"The saving grace for Poland is that this swine flu pandemic is so far very mild. It would be a big scandal if this were a virus that would cause many deaths," said Andrew McMichael, an immunologist and the director of the Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine at Oxford.

Other conspiracy theories claim the drug companies making the vaccine secretly lobbied the WHO to declare swine flu a global epidemic to fatten their own pockets, a theory unproven but which some Europeans seem inclined to believe. Even the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe recently recommended that the EU investigate WHO's swine flu pandemic declaration to see if the body acted under undue influence.

In an e-mailed statement, WHO said its members "guard against the influence of any vested interests" but declined any other comment on the allegations, saying the group's flu chief, Dr. Keiji Fukuda, will address them during a news conference Thursday.

WHO spokeswoman Karen Mah said the organization has no reports of other countries rejecting the vaccine outright. Some countries, however, haven't launched vaccine programs because they lack the money.

Poland's approach contrasts sharply with steps taken by countries such as the United States - where President Barack Obama and his family got swine flu shots to set an example - and European countries like Austria and Sweden that stockpiled enough for their entire populations.

Other eastern EU members have also embraced inoculation, with Hungary and Romania even producing their own domestic vaccines against H1N1, the official name of the current swine flu strain. Romania has seen a burst of interest in vaccines in recent days following the death from swine flu of a well known TV actor, 37-year-old Toni Tecuceanu, on Jan. 5. Over the weekend, 13,000 people got vaccinated in Bucharest alone, the Health Ministry said Monday - vastly more than previous weekends that saw a few dozen at most ask for the jab.

But no well-known Pole has died, and flu fears failed to take root in the country of 38 million people.

Only one leading official, Janusz Kochanowski, the ombudsman for civil rights, has waged a prominent public fight against the government over vaccines, condemning its stance as irrational and irresponsible. He vowed to sue the health minister for a symbolic 1 zloty (35 U.S. cents/25 euro cents) for what he describes as a human rights offense: unnecessarily risking the health of the population by refusing to make vaccines available or take any other steps to fight the spread of swine flu.

Kochanowski came down with swine flu himself over the Christmas holidays, a turn of bad luck he viewed as deeply ironic. During a recent interview in his office he sneezed into a tissue from time to time, and his voice was raspy as he strongly denounced the government.

"In a normal country the media would attack a government that doesn't want to buy vaccines and which doesn't give citizens the right to choose. It's a basic right," Kochanowski told The Associated Press. "The constitution obliges the government to counteract and prevent epidemics. But rather than attacking the government, the media are attacking me."

 

Though there have been no recent opinion surveys on the matter, Kochanowski and several doctors say there is abundant anecdotal evidence showing that most Poles support the government's approach.

"Unfortunately most people are on the side of the government," Kochanowski said.

Kochanowski says he worries that the government's luck in dodging massive problems with swine flu will only encourage it to ignore future epidemics as well.

"This flu will pass, but there is a new flu every year and the government should prepare every year. However, this government is not only not preparing, but it's making a special point of not being prepared and then claims glory," he said.

In Poland, doctors are deeply divided on the matter, but some are clearly critical of the government.

"It should be the patient's rights to choose - that would be democracy in health care," said Maria Ciesielska, a family doctor whose disapproval only intensified when her 7-year-old son was laid up for a week with swine flu in November. "Even Hippocrates said it's not ethical to not offer a cure if you know that one exists."

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Agent Bolek By Professor Marek Jan Chodakiewicz from Washington DC

Agent Bolek By Professor Marek Jan Chodakiewicz from Washington DC

Pod Prąd - Cenckiewicz i Gontarczyk 1/4




Published in the Intelligencer: Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies, vol. 17, no. 2 (Fall 2009): 108-110

Three important books have recently been published about Lech Wałęsa, world famous “Solidarity” leader and, later, President of Poland. Paweł Zyzak’s impishly shocking Lech Wałęsa - idea i historia. Biografia polityczna legendarnego przywódcy "Solidarności" do 1988 roku [Lech Wałęsa: Ideology and history: A political biography of the legendary leader of „Solidarity” until 1988] (Cracow: Arcana, 2009) is an irreverent attempt to demolish the legend. The work is mammoth and laboriously annotated with a plethora of primary sources cited. However, its most iconoclastic parts, concerning Wałęsa’s private life with the allegations of irreligiousness, rowdiness, and an illegitimate child, are based on oral interviews with sometimes anonymous sources who grew up with the feature Nobel Peace Prize winner in a small village in Pomerania. Some of the anonymous sources have voluntarily revealed themselves since, thus lending more credibility to their allegations. Yet, equally controversial part of Zyzak’s book, regarding the 1970s and 1980s, is heavily indebted to the research of two very serious scholars, Sławomir Cenckiewicz and Piotr Gontarczyk, who specialize in unmasking the secrets of the Communist secret police.
Cenckiewicz and Gontarczyk first published their magisterial SB a Lech Wałęsa: Przyczynek do biografii [The Security Service and Lech Wałęsa: A Contribution to His Biography] (Gdańsk, Warsaw, and Cracow: IPN, 2008). This tome contains about 300 pages of astute analysis and as many pages of declassified top secret documents. Soon after, Cenckiewicz abridged their work as Sprawa Lecha Wałęsy [The case of Lech Wałęsa] (Poznań: Zysk i ska, 2008). The former is an exhaustive scholarly monograph intended mainly for historians. The latter work is aimed at the popular reader. The reason why Cenckiewicz appears as its sole author has to do with the combustive controversy which erupted following the publication of the earlier work. Following hysterical attacks on the authors by mostly post-Communist and liberal apologists of Lech Wałęsa, Cenckiewicz demonstratively quit a top post at Poland’s Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), the main depository of the former Communist secret police archives. Gontarczyk retained his job at the IPN but now keeps a low profile.
What’s the uproar all about? The authors show unequivocally that between 1970 and 1976 Lech Wałęsa was registered by the Communist secret police as its Secret Collaborator (tajny współpracownik -- TW). His codename was “Bolek,” a dimunitive from Boleslaus. Most documents concerning “Bolek” were destroyed. However, the remaining materials strongly suggest that he was most active between December 1970 and December 1972. His activity coincided with the anti-Communist strikes and riots on the Baltic Sea board in general, and Gdańsk in particular, and their aftermath. Wałęsa had been on the strike committee in December 1970. Almost immediately he was recruited to denounce his anti-Communist friends. He accepted financial remuneration for his deeds. After a while, however, Wałęsa became disenchanted with both the political situation in the Polish People’s Republic and collaboration with the secret police. He quit informing. The secret police de-registered him accordingly. From the empirical point of view this process has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt in The Security Service and Lech Wałęsa and The Case of Lech Wałęsa.
The Security Service (Służba Bezpieczeństwa -- SB) attempted to recruit Wałęsa once again when he became active in the dissident Free Trade Unions (Wolne Związki Zawodowe – WZZ) in 1977. But he refused. Meanwhile, he also confessed about his previous unsavory activities to his friends of the WZZ. He promised them not to have any contacts with the secret police anymore. In fact, his dissident superiors explicitly forbade him to agree to talk. Yet, Wałęsa continued to meet with the SB men occasionally at their request, which created a precedent. He got used to his interrogators. He got used to a peculiar game. He would take advantage of it on a larger scale when, at the behest of the WZZ leader Bogdan Borusewicz, Wałęsa took over the leadership of the strike at the Gdańsk shipyard in August 1980. What resulted, of course, was a Polish national liberation movement masking as Independent, Self-Governed Trade Union “Solidarity”.
From its inception, Wałęsa was a moderate, centrist figure. He always played his cards coyly. He frequently deceived both his friends and enemies. And he was a superb self-promoter. In the power struggles that ensued within “Solidarity”, its leader crushed the weak and discarded the superfluous. His populism was unmatched. When necessary, he played the card of radicalism. And then he would promptly backtrack. Almost invariably his games would culminate in a compromise with the stronger party. For example, at the request of the Communist management, Wałęsa terminated the August strike prematurely, agreeing only to accept a pay raise, and abandoning the postulate of a free trade union. Only a determined surge by Anna Walentynowicz and Alina Pieńkowska saved the strike. The women bodily blocked the dockers from leaving, shamed them, and appealed to their sense of solidarity with the workers from other enterprises who had struck in support of their shipyard friends but now were being abandoned. The dockers listened and continued until they forced the Communists to allow them to establish “Solidarity.” Wałęsa became the head of the union.
For some, his centrism, moderation, and propensity to compromise were the signs of anti-radicalism, retarding the progress of the liberation movement, and, indeed, kow-towing to the Communists. Meanwhile, Wałęsa attempted to be everything for everyone. A rightist one evening, he supported the left the following morning. And then he would invariably stress his centrism. Many were confused by his pragmatism devoid of any ideas. But, according to him, it expedited the cause of “Solidarity.” Others took a less charitable view. They saw his actions as either a rotten compromise or dictatorial inclinations or even secret police covert work (agentura).
Here both the insufficient number of documents and a strange stonewalling by the leader of “Solidarity” allow for a number of interpretations. The brief for the prosecution is that Wałęsa was possibly an agent. The brief for the defense is that he was not at all. An impartial judge, basing himself on available documents, can conclude that, in the 1980s, Wałęsa skirted dangerously close to treason but that was just a tactical game to stay politically relevant and support “Solidarity.”
For example, after the Communist imposed marital law and arrested him in December 1981, Wałęsa, talking in his customary disjointed manner (and a transcript is extant), bragged to his secret police goalies that he had gotten rid of the “extremists” in the “Solidarity” leadership. Tactically, he ascribed to himself those characteristics and attitudes that the Communists wanted to see in him at the time. He negotiated with General Wojciech Jaruzelski as an underling. He even signed his public plea to the general as “Lance corporal Wałęsa.” He says now that he was playing a game. This is obvious.
The problem is that the Communists dictated the rules. To remain on the political scene, Wałęsa had to continuously make himself valuable to them. But he had to stop short of selling himself out. If he had, he would have been rejected by “Solidarity” supporters and his utility for the regime would have disappeared. The objective was to avoid becoming superfluous. So Wałęsa talked with the secret police; he stayed in the game. He accepted the Communist false wooing and broken promises; but he kept dating them without giving in. Until 1989, however, the leader of “Solidarity” refrained from fully consuming the union.
The aforementioned mechanisms are laid bare in both The Security Service and Lech Wałęsa and The Case of Lech Wałęsa. Therefore one should resolutely reject the charge that he was a secret police agent after 1976. So-called Communist support for Wałęsa against his rivals in the leadership of „Solidarity” served mostly the interests of the Warsaw regime. The Communists plainly viewed him as less dangerous than some of his “Solidarity” peers. Thus, the secret police undercut them in clandestine operations.
Of course, if the utility of Wałęsa had ended, the Communists would have either retired or disappeared him. But because he stayed in the game as a centrist, he was a lesser evil to them. Still, the SB considered him an enemy throughout because he did not sell out “Solidarity” and did not join the official, Communist-controlled unions. Instead, in 1989, Wałęsa made an unequal political deal with them. He resolved to become their junior partner in a Communist-led regime which emerged from openly falsified elections, where only 35% of the seats were open for democratic contest and the rest guaranteed to the Communists. Widely touted as a “free election”, in a long run, the vote was a victory for the Moscow-backed regime which, thus, was able to transition to post-Communism.
If that sounds complicated, Wałęsa’s affairs became positively Byzantine after 1989. Having quarreled with „Solidarity” leftists and liberals, Wałęsa feigned a right-wing shift to be elected the President of Poland. Once in office, he jettisoned the right and banked on the post-Communists, members of the Security Service and military intelligence in particular. Among some of the more astounding aberrations, as the documents discovered by Cenckiewicz and Gontarczyk prove, is the caper where the Communist secret police officers, who had persecuted Wałęsa as his case handlers in the 1980s, weaseled their way into the President’s good graces to become his personal bodyguards. Later, the same officers purged the secret police archives from the documents regarding Wałęsa’s stint as a snitch in the early 1970s to cover up his past. The operation was halted by the civilian post-Communists who appointed new Poland’s rightist secret servicemen to protect the archives from Wałęsa’s ex-SB minions. Perhaps it would be best to characterize the new secret servicemen as law-abiding professionals who happened to be conservative in distinction to the cynical old hands trained by the KGB.
In any event, after 1989, as far as the case of “Bolek,” law was routinely violated, documents falsified, materials destroyed, and opponents persecuted. Further, in 1992, a nefarious kabala under Wałęsa’s tutelage overthrew a center-right government who, in legally fulfilling an act of the parliament, revealed the names of the former Communist secret police agents still in power at that time, including “Bolek”. The presidential coup was probably the moral nadir of post-Communist Poland.
The Security Service and Lech Wałęsa and The Case of Lech Wałęsa amply document the history of deception, theft, and destruction of the documents of treason. The perpetrators aimed at preserving the angelic myth of the first leader of “Solidarity” and the first democratically elected President of post-Communist Poland. This is a disservice to freedom and democracy which are predicated on openness and transparency. Wałęsa’s great contributions to the nation’s independence are beyond any doubt. An apology for the sins of his youth would have solved the case a long time ago and silenced his detractors. The coverup has been foolish and served mostly the interests of the post-Communists who are vitally interested in hiding their own past. They have been shrewdly hiding behind Wałęsa. However, soon scholars like Gontarczyk and Cenckiewicz will put the spotlight on them. Poland is in the process of coming to grips with its totalitarian past and nothing can reverse the tide.

Marek Jan Chodakiewicz
Washington, DC, 31 July 2009
www.iwp.edu

Piotr Gontarczyk and Sławomir Cenckiewicz, SB a Lech Wałęsa: Przyczynek do biografii (Gdańsk, Warszawa i Kraków: IPN, 2008).
Sławomir Cenckiewicz, Sprawa Lecha Wałęsy (Poznań: Zysk i ska, 2008)
Paweł Zyzak, Lech Wałęsa - idea i historia. Biografia polityczna legendarnego przywódcy "Solidarności" do 1988 roku (Cracow: Arcana, 2009).
Marek Jan Chodakiewicz
Academic Dean and Professor of History, The Kościuszko Chair in Polish Studies

Professional Experience

- Former assistant professor of history of the Kosciuszko Chair in Polish Studies at the Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia
- Former visiting professor of history, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles

Dr. Chodakiewicz is the current holder of the Kosciuszko Chair of Polish Studies, which is now here at IWP. He has authored numerous works in both English and Polish. While at the University of Virginia , he edited the Kosciuszko Chair's bulletin: Nihil Novi.
Nihil Novi #1
Nihil Novi #2
Nihil Novi #3

In addition to popular and scholarly articles, his publications include The Massacre in Jedwabne, July 10, 1941: Before, During, After (2005), Between Nazis and Soviets: Occupation Politics in Poland, 1939-1947 (2004) and After the Holocaust: Polish-Jewish Conflict in the Wake of World War Two (2003).

Dr. Chodakiewicz co-edited Poland's Transformation: A Work in Progress (2003) and Spanish Carlism and Polish Nationalism: Borderlands of Europe in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (2003).

He translated and edited the correspondence of the Ulam family of Lwów to the mathematician Stanislaw Ulam at Harvard from 1936 until after the Second World War. In 2003 Dr. Chodakiewicz won Poland's Jozef Mackiewicz Literary Award for his Ejszyszki: The Background of Events, and Epilogue of Polish-Jewish Relations in the Eastern Borderlands, 1944-45. In 2004 he co-edited a selection of Ronald Reagan's speeches published as My Vision of America in Polish.





Education


•B.A., 1988, San Francisco State University
•M.A.,1990, MPhil,1992, Columbia University
•Ph.D., 2001, Columbia University
Honors and Awards

•Richard Hofstadter Fellowship (1989-1994), Columbia University
•The Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Poland Research Grant (2001)
•The Earhart Foundation Fellowship Research Grant (2004)
•Presidential Appointee, United States Holocaust Memorial Council (2005-2010)

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Zofia i Henryk Hop z Brzuski na Podkarpaciu nie mają pieniędzy na jedzenie. By móc się ogrzać, para 70-latków drzewo do opału zbiera w lesie

Zofia i Henryk Hop z Brzuski na Podkarpaciu nie mają pieniędzy na jedzenie. By móc się ogrzać, para 70-latków drzewo do opału zbiera w lesie

PROSIMY O POMOC
Bank Spółdzielczy w Żurawicy, oddz. w Birczy 22 91131014 2003 5000 0228 0040, koniecznie z dopiskiem "Pomoc dla Hopów”.
http://www.tvn24.pl/0,1637812,0,1,nie-maja-na-chleb-dostali-kare-za-galezie-z-lasu,wiadomosc.html


Nie mają na chleb. Dostali karę za gałęzie z lasu
PROSTO Z POLSKI

TVN24
Zofia i Henryk Hop z Brzuski na Podkarpaciu nie mają pieniędzy na jedzenie. By móc się ogrzać, para 70-latków drzewo do opału zbiera w lesie. Kiedy staruszkowie za namową sołtysa chcieli posprzątać gałęzie z wycinki zostali oskarżeni o kradzież drewna. Wyrządzone przez nich straty wyceniono na 11 złotych i 78 groszy... Teraz muszą zapłacić karę, na którą ich nie stać. Sprawą zajęli się leśnicy, policja, sąd, a na końcu komornik.
Zgłosili się na ochotnika Prosił mnie czy bym nie znalazł kogoś, kto by te patyki posprzątał. W zamian za sprzątnięcie gałęzi mógłby za darmo zabrać do domu.
Tadeusz Kołcz, sołtys

Wszystko zaczęło się kilka miesięcy temu. Wiosną, w pobliżu ich domu, drogowcy wycinali przydrożne drzewa. Pozostałe z wycinki gałęzie trzeba było posprzątać. Kierownik prac zgłosił się więc do sołtysa. - Prosił mnie czy bym nie znalazł kogoś, kto by te patyki posprzątał. W zamian za sprzątnięcie gałęzi mógłby za darmo zabrać do domu - mówi Tadeusz Kołcz, sołtys wsi Brzuska.

Do prac zgłosiło się małżeństwo. Zdecydowali, że pójdą i pozbierają patyki. - No i pojechaliśmy traktorem - mówi Zofia Hop. Jak dodaje, zebrane gałęzie zwozili do domu. Problem pojawił się, kiedy dojazd do kolejnych utrudniły im dwa - jak twierdzą - połamane drzewka.

Wycięli dwa połamane drzewka My na łopatkach leżymy. Raz nam uwalili, drugi raz uwalili. Jak trzeci raz uwalą to my tu pozdychamy.
Zofia Hop

- Chcieliśmy wjechać traktorem. To wziął mój chłop wyciął i już - mówi Zofia.

Wycięcie dwóch drzewek spowodowało poważne kłopoty i uruchomiło machinę sądowniczą. Wkrótce w domu Hopów pojawiła się policja. Małżonkowie zostali oskarżeni o kradzież drewna. Straty wyceniono na 11 złotych 78 groszy.

Choć szkody są bardzo małe, staruszków ukarano, bo jak argumentuje Stanisław Rębisz, zastępca nadleśniczego z Nadleśnictwa Bircza "dom można rozebrać wyciągając cegłę po cegle. Tak samo można wyciąć las wycinając małe gałęzie".

"Nie mamy co jeść" Dom można rozebrać wyciągając cegłę po cegle. Tak samo można wyciąć las wycinając małe gałęzie
Stanisław Rębisz, zastępca nadleśniczego z Nadleśnictwa Bircza

- Zasądzono państwu Hop po 100 zł grzywny i 58 złotych nawiązki - dodaje Rębisz. Jednak pary 70-latków nie było stać na zapłacenie kary, więc sprawa trafiła do sądu. Do egzekucji długu wkroczył komornik, który zajął rentę pana Henryka i emeryturę pani Zofii. - My na łopatkach leżymy. Raz nam uwalili, drugi raz uwalili. Jak trzeci raz uwalą to my tu pozdychamy - mówi z łzami w oczach pani Zofia i tłumaczy, że na zapłacenie kary zwyczajnie ich nie stać. Urzędnicy wiedzą jednak lepiej - i twierdzą, że staruszkom nie wiedzie się źle, bo nigdy nie ubiegali się o pomoc finansową czy materialną.

Jednak to, że o pomoc nigdy nie prosili, nie znaczy jednak, że jej nie potrzebują. - My nie mamy na jedzenie. Nawet kartofli nie mamy, bo są tu straszliwe dziki - dodają.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Torture by the Communist jews in Poland Stalin NKVD

Torture by the Communist jews in Poland Stalin NKVD
Żydzi, Wałęsa i Polonia, cz. 3/3

Żydzi, Wałęsa i Polonia, cz. 2/3

Saturday, January 9, 2010

NAM NIE SĄ POTRZEBNI POLACY (4/5)

NAM NIE SĄ POTRZEBNI POLACY (4/5)



Prof. dr hab. Piotr Jaroszyński





AUTOBIOGRAFIA



Edukacja w okresie PRL-u na poziomie szkoły podstawowej (1962-70) i średniej (Liceum Ogółnokształcące,1970-74) odegrała w moim życiu minimalną rolę.Znaczenie miał dom, w którym żywe były tradycje patriotyczne, zarówno powstań (dziadek ze strony Mamy pochodził z Pniew, był powstańcem wielkopolskim) oraz kresów (rodzina ze strony Ojca pochodzi z Nowogródczyzny, przebywała na zesłaniu na Syberii od 1940 do 1946 roku); dom tętnił wysoką kulturą języka polskiego (poezja, teatr), ponieważ oboje rodzice są aktorami.

Do samej nauki szkolnej można było poważnie podejść dopiero na Katolickim Uniwersytecie Lubelskim, gdy w październiku 1974 rozpocząłem studia na Wydziale Filozofii Chrześcijańskiej, na sekcji filozofii teoretycznej. KUL był wtedy niewielkim uniwersytetem (ok. 4 tys. studentów, dziś ponad 20 tys.). Rektorem był wówczas O. Profesor Mieczysław Albert Krąpiec (twórca Filozoficznej Szkoły Lubelskiej), a dziekanem wydziału ks. Prof. Stanisław Kamiński (metodologia nauk). Na pierwszym roku dojeżdżał jeszcze Prof. Stefan Swieżawski (historia filozofii nowożytnej, czytaliśmy Rozprawę o metodzie Kartezjusza), a poza tym do najbardziej cenionych przeze mnie do dziś wykładowców należał ks. Prof. Marian Kurdziałek (historia filozofii starożytnej i średniowiecznej).

Formalnie kierownikiem Katedry Etyki był aż do chwili wyboru na papieża ks. Prof. Karol Wojtyła, ale z Krakowa przyjeżdżał na KUL bardzo rzadko. Nasza sekcja była mała, zadziwiająco mała. Ówczesne Ministerstwo Edukacji narzuciło bowiem limit – władza bała się ludzi wykształconych – aby na Wydział Filozofii (w skład w którego wchodziły obok filozofii, psychologia, socjologia i filozofia przyrody) można było przyjąć w sumie tylko... 30 osób! Na każdą sekcję przypadało więc po 5 studentów. Dla nas miało to swoją dobrą stronę, gdyż tak elitarnej szkoły nie było w świecie, i chyba już nie będzie. Oczywiście, znalazły się sposoby, żeby obejść przepisy i z pewnym poślizgiem dokooptować kilku nowych chętnych, zaś na drugim roku dołączali księża. Tak naprawdę było więc nas kilkanaście osób na roku.

Lekcje łaciny i lekcje greki, poznawanie poglądów Talesa, Pitagorasa, Parmenidesa, Sokratesa, Platona, Arystotelesa, Seneki, św. Augustyna, św. Alberta Wielkiego, św. Tomasza z Akwinu, Kartezjusza, Leibniza, Spinozy, Kanta, Heideggera (by wymienić tylko nielicznych), dzięki profesorom, dla których te postacie były pasją ich życia i których poglądy znali w oryginale; profesorom, dla których Europa, Zachód, to najpierw Grecja, Rzym, średniowieczna Europa, dla których Polska znaczyła coś więcej niż PRL – jakaż to była różnica, wręcz przepaść, dzieląca moją wcześniejszą edukację, a właściwie pobyt w szkole, z tym, co mogłem poznawać, naprawdę i dogłębnie.

Czy można iść na filozofię nie mając zamiłowania do czytania, analizowania, słuchania ludzi mądrzejszych od siebie lub bez otwarcia się na myśl, która pomaga poznać prawdę, wcale niełatwą, ale jakże ważną? Postanowiłem studiować filozofię w trzeciej klasie liceum, to tak po prostu człowieka naszło. Najpierw zainteresowała mnie trzytomowa Historia Estetyki Władysława Tatarkiewicza, a potem przypadkiem trafiła w moje ręce Krytyka praktycznego rozumu Kanta, którą całą przeczytałem – nic z niej nie rozumiejąc. Gdyby mnie nie ciągnęła filozofia, odłożyłbym Kanta już po pierwszym zdaniu. Dziś rozumiem, że miałem prawo nie rozumieć.

Friday, January 8, 2010

Zamordowanie Generala Papaly by Michalkiewicz 01/06/2010 Sprawa Mazura z Chicago jako zleceniodawcy

Zamordowanie Generala Papaly by Michalkiewicz 01/06/2010 Sprawa Mazura z Chicago jako zleceniodawcy



Myśląc Ojczyzna
red. Stanisław Michalkiewicz (2010-01-06) Felieton

słuchaj
zapisz




"Lichy i durnowaty"

Szanowni Państwo!
Najwyraźniej jeszcze przed Świętami Bożego Narodzenia musiała zapaść decyzja o wejściu w decydującą fazę przygotowań do wyborów prezydenckich. Trup bowiem ściele się gęsto i jeszcze nie obeschły nam łzy po stracie pana Michniewicza, dyrektora Kancelarii Premiera Donalda Tuska, który w przeddzień Wigilii powiesił się we własnym mieszkaniu, a już mamy nowego nieboszczyka w osobie Artura Zirajewskiego. Był on, jak wiadomo głównym świadkiem w sprawie zabójstwa generała Marka Papały, która ciągnie się już 11 lat. Widać, że prokuratura pracuje dokładnie - aż do ostatniego świadka. Więc Artur Zirajewski tym razem wcale się nie powiesił, tylko taktownie umarł "z przyczyn chorobowych", a konkretnie - na zator płucny. Jak się świadkowi robi taki zator płucny - tego jeszcze nie wiem, ale medycyna z pewnością zna takie sposoby, zwłaszcza gdy przyczyną zatoru płucnego były chyba zeznania, jakimi Artur Zirajewski obciążył pana Edwarda Mazura. Pan Edward Mazur, znakomicie uplasowany i u nas i w Ameryce, podejrzewany jest wprawdzie o sprawstwo kierownicze, ale wcale się tym nie przejmuje. Jest pełen wigoru i planów na przyszłość - i słusznie, bo dlaczego niby miałby się przejmować jakimiś podejrzeniami, skoro Artur Zirajewski właśnie taktownie umarł i to w dodatku - "z przyczyn chorobowych" - o czym zapewnił nas wystraszony nieco pan minister Kwiatkowski.
Na tym tle blednie zupełnie męczeństwo pana senatora Krzysztofa Piesiewicza, któremu prokuratura w pierwszym odruchu chciała nawet stawiać jakieś zarzuty. Ale słusznie Janusz Wilhelmi przestrzegał, żeby nie kierować się pierwszymi odruchami - bo mogą być uczciwe. Okazało się, że to święte słowa, bo wprawdzie i pan senator Piesiewicz w pierwszym odruchu zrezygnował z immunitetu, ale wkrótce okazało się, że uczynił to "bez swojej wiedzy i zgody" - podobnie jak wiele innych osobistości. W tej sytuacji jego sprawa może rozstrzygnąć się w całkiem innych kategoriach i cnota zostanie nagrodzona.
Ale to wszystko drobiazg w porównaniu z operacją, którą za pozwoleniem Komisji Europejskiej szykuje nam rząd premiera Tuska. Wprawdzie i pan premier i jego minister finansów, poddany brytyjski pan Rostowski, a także stado niezależnych publicystów - jeszcze niedawno przekonywali nas, że jest dobrze, a będzie jeszcze lepiej, że Polska jest już nie dziesiątą, jaką była za Edwarda Gierka, ale szóstą potęgą gospodarczą, że straszliwy kryzys finansowy, co to pustoszy cały świat, dzięki zbiorowej mądrości partii Polskę szczęśliwie ominął, jednak - co ma wisieć - nie utonie. Ale zanim przejdę do szczegółów - chwila wspomnień historycznych.
9 grudnia 1708 roku rosyjski car Piotr Wielki wydał zarządzenie w którym między innymi czytamy, że: "Podwładny powinien przed obliczem przełożonego mieć wygląd lichy i durnowaty tak, żeby swoim pojmowaniem sprawy nie peszył przełożonego".
I kiedy oglądamy telewizyjne relacje z wizyt naszych dygnitarzy państwowych w Brukseli, to od razu widać, kto jest tam przełożonym, a kto - podwładnym. I słusznie - bo któż to widział żeby w kołchozie jakiś, dajmy na to, traktorzysta, był mądrzejszy od przewodniczącego? Toteż pan premier Tusk może sobie opowiadać bajki o szóstej potędze gospodarczej na użytek publiczności tubylczej, ale kiedy przychodzi co do czego, to musi akomodować się do opinii starszych i mądrzejszych.
A wiadomo przecież, że na podstawie uzgodnień, jakie generał Czesław Kiszczak poczynił ze swoimi agentami i pożytecznymi idiotami w Magdalence, starsi i mądrzejsi utrzymali kontrolę między innymi nad kluczowymi segmentami polskiej gospodarki, z sektorem finansowym na czele. Pilnował tego interesu obudowywany kolejnymi rządami Leszek Balcerowicz, no a obecnie zadanie to powierzono premieru Tusku.
I właśnie tuż przed Bożym Narodzeniem Komisja Europejska zatwierdziła polski program dokapitalizowania instytucji finansowych, przygotowany przez rząd premiera Tuska. Ma on na celu - jak czytamy - "utrzymanie stabilności polskiego sektora finansowego w dobie kryzysu finansowego".
Wprawdzie - jak wielokrotnie słyszeliśmy od samego pana premiera - w Polsce żadnego kryzysu finansowego nie ma, ale musimy pamiętać, że pan premier może sobie tak mówić przed telewizyjnymi kamerami. Natomiast w obliczu swoich przełożonych z razwiedki natychmiast przybiera wygląd "lichy i durnowanty" i kiedy oni mówią jemu, że kryzys finansowy jest i instytucje finansowe panstwo powino nafutrować gotówką, to on się słucha. Stąd to wrażenie dysonansu poznawczego, które jednak - jak to z pierwszymi wrażeniami bywa - nie powinno w ogóle się liczyć, bo może być uczciwe.
Najwyraźniej polska razwiedka musiała pożałować okazji i postanowiła wykorzystać kryzys finansowy do dodatkowego oskubania tubylczych podatników. Mechanizm jest następujący: kontrolowane przez starszych i mądrzejszych instytucje finansowe zwiększają fundusze własne poprzez emisję akcji lub obligacji. Ale te akcje lub obligacje mogą nie znaleźć nabywców, bo kto by tam kupował akcje czy obligacje wypuszczane przez grandziarzy? Toteż jeśli tych akcji lub obligacji nikt nie będzie chciał kupić, to wykupi je Skarb Państwa. A jeśli grandziarze i to rozkradną, wskutek czego instytucja finansowa zostanie zagrożona utratą wypłacalności, to Skarb Państwa może ją nawet przejąć. Skutkiem tych operacji może być - a jak może być, to na pewno będzie - konieczność zwiększenia deficytu budżetowego. Za to można będzie utrzymać poziom zatrudnienia w isnstytucjach finansowych - no i oczywiście - pensji dla grandziarzy, którzy nauczyli się już zarabiać na kryzysie.
Oto mamy plan rabunku podatników pod pretekstem zapewnienia im bezpieczeństwa finansowego. Pod pretekstem - bo za to bezpieczeństwo będą musieli dodatkowo zapłacić tytułem wzrostu kosztów obsługi długu publicznego, które już wkrótce mogą przekroczyć 34 miliardy złotych, a więc - prawie 1000 złotych rocznie na osobę.
A ubocznym skutkiem tej operacji będzie zwiekszenie socjalistycznego sektora państwowego, do którego tak wielu ludzi w Polsce tęskni. W sektorze państwowym, jak wiadomo, kto inny podejmuje decyzje, a kto inny ponosi ich konsekwencje ekonomiczne. Decyzje podejmuja grandziarze lub liurokraci --co na jedno wychodzi, a płacić za to muszą podatnicy. I dlatego zdominowana przez socjalistów Unia Europejska takie rozwiązania nie tylko popiera, ale i zaleca, wobec czego naszym mężom stanu nie pozostaje nic innego, jak przybrać wygląd "lichy i durnowaty" - zgodnie z zarządzeniem cara Piotra Wielkiego.
Mówił Stanisław Michalkiewicz

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Panstwo Polskie bierne w pomocy Polakom, a gzie jest Tusk i Radoslaw Sikorski z PO?

Panstwo Polskie bierne w pomocy Polakom, a gzie jest Tusk i Radoslaw Sikorski z PO?




Panstwo Polskie bierne w pomocy Polakom, a gzie jest Tusk i Radoslaw Sikorski z PO?
Sąd Najwyższy przyjął skargę kasacyjną Winicjusza Natoniewskiego, który domaga się od polskich sądów przyjęcia sprawy przeciwko państwu niemieckiemu.
sen. Dorota Arciszewska-Mielewczyk (2009-12-30) Aktualności dnia


słuchaj
zapisz

http://www.radiomaryja.pl/audycje.php?id=19700

Zobacz również inne publikacje związane z tym tematem:AUDYCJE:
■Sąd Najwyższy przyjął skargę kasacyjną Winicjusza Natoniewskiego, który domaga się od polskich sądów przyjęcia sprawy przeciwko państwu niemieckiemu.- [2009-12-30]
sen. Dorota Arciszewska-Mielewczyk

■Komisja "hazardowa" zamienia się w farsę- [2009-12-29]
pos. Zbigniew Wasserman

■Komisja "hazardowa" zamienia się w farsę- [2009-12-17]
pos. Beata Kempa - Zastępca przewodniczącego Sejmowej Komisji Sprawiedliwości i Praw Człowieka

■Naciski przewodniczącego komisji "hazardowej" na Beatę Kempę- [2009-12-08]
pos. Beata Kempa - Zastępca przewodniczącego Sejmowej Komisji Sprawiedliwości i Praw Człowieka

■Wassermann i Kępa wykluczeni z komisji "hazardowej"- [2009-12-07]
pos. Zbigniew Wassermann

■Kontrowersyjne działania komisji "hazardowej"- [2009-12-07]
pos. Antoni Macierewicz

■PO chce zmian w komisji ds. afery hazardowej- [2009-11-27]
pos. Beata Kempa - Zastępca przewodniczącego Sejmowej Komisji Sprawiedliwości i Praw Człowieka

■Prace komisji śledczej ds. afery hazardowej- [2009-11-25]
pos. Zbigniew Wassermann - członek "hazardowej" komisji śledczej

■Komisja hazardowa na starcie- [2009-11-10]
pos. Mariusz Błaszczak

■Praca komisji śledczej ds. afery hazardowej- [2009-11-07]
pos. Beata Kempa - Zastępca przewodniczącego Sejmowej Komisji Sprawiedliwości i Praw Człowieka

■Wokół Komisji hazardowej- [2009-11-05]
pos. Mariusz Błaszczak

■Losy komisji śledczej ds. afery hazardowej- [2009-11-03]
pos. Wojciech Szarama

■Ustawa hazardowa- [2009-10-28]
pos. Aleksandra Natalli - Świat - wiceprezes PiS

■Konferencja prasowa Mariusza Kamińskiego- [2009-10-06]


■Fragment konferencji prasowej Mariusza Kamińskiego- [2009-10-06]


■Afera hazardowa- [2009-10-06]
Zbigniew Ziobro - poseł do PE

■Spotkanie u prezydenta Lecha Kaczyńskiego nt. afery hazardowej" - [2009-10-02]
Krzysztof Putra v-ce marszałek Senatu RP

■Afera hazardowa- [2009-10-02]
Pos. Antonii Macierewicz

■Afera większa niż rywinowska?- [2009-10-01]
pos. Zbigniew Wasserman

■Afera hazardowa- [2009-10-01]
pos. Beata Kępa - były wiceminister sprawiedliwości

ARTYKUŁY:
■Posłowie Platformy dostawali pytania przez gadu-gadu - [2009-12-30]

■Kłopoty z ekspertami - [2009-12-19]

■Platforma przesłucha PiS - [2009-12-18]

■Będą przesłuchani, ale nie wiadomo, kiedy - [2009-12-16]

■Nie będzie reasumpcji - [2009-12-15]

■Niech Palikot nam nie grozi - [2009-12-09]

■PiS: Zagłosujcie jeszcze raz - [2009-12-09]

■Co chce zbadać PO? - [2009-11-19]

■Automaty w Trybunale? - [2009-11-18]

■Powinniśmy zacząć od Kamińskiego - [2009-11-18]

■Kto pierwszy przed komisją - [2009-11-18]

■Nawet stu świadków - [2009-11-14]

■Tempo prac może być "zabójcze" - [2009-11-09]

■Weź pan "jednorękiego bandytę" - [2009-11-02]

■Sekuła jak Nałęcz? - [2009-10-27]

■Za dwa tygodnie, a może miesiące - [2009-10-24]

■Platforma detonuje niewypał - [2009-10-23]

■Tusk schodzi ze sceny afery - [2009-10-23]

■PO szykuje swojego - [2009-10-22]

■Umarł król, niech żyje król - [2009-10-17]

■Ta afera osłabi Polskę - [2009-10-14]

■Premier w cieniu poważnych domniemań karnych - [2009-10-08]

■Tusk zaskoczony, choć wiedział od sierpnia - [2009-10-08]

■Rządowa ruletka - [2009-10-08]

■Celem jest usunięcie Kamińskiego - [2009-10-07]

■To zemsta polityczna - [2009-10-07]

■Jak komisja, to w przyszłym roku - [2009-10-07]

■Afera hazardowa przebiła rywinowską - [2009-10-06]

■Dymisja Drzewieckiego ma obronić Tuska - [2009-10-06]

■Kto jeszcze? - [2009-10-06]

■"Grześ" powinien się wytłumaczyć - [2009-10-06]

■Komisja będzie testem na wiarygodność polityków - [2009-10-05]

■Dzięki CBA korupcja się zmniejszyła - [2009-10-05]

■Na co czeka Tusk - [2009-10-05]

■Nie dać się zepchnąć do defensywy - [2009-10-05]

■Rządzący nie są zdolni do wyjaśnienia tej sprawy - [2009-10-03]

■Premierowi puszczają nerwy - [2009-10-03]

■Prawdziwą wojnę stoczyłem - [2009-10-02]

■To ogromny dyskomfort dla premiera - [2009-10-02]

■Minister bagatelizuje sprawę - [2009-10-02]

■Czuma już uniewinnił kolegów - [2009-10-02]